Friday, July 10, 2015

You are here: Home > Boats for Sale by Owner > sleekcraft boats

sleekcraft boats

by admin

No items matching your keywords were found.


No items matching your keywords were found.

sleekcraft boats
sleekcraft boats
Need help naming my boat?


I have a Sleekcraft boat and am looking to name it using a spin on the word "SLEEK"....such as "SLEEKING Around or Sleek Attack" any ideas? Thanks!

I think you have it nailed with "sleek attack"



No items matching your keywords were found.


No items matching your keywords were found.


Drain Valve for Transom Boats


Drain Valve for Transom Boats


$12


Replacement drain valve for your 12.6sr or 14sr Sport Runabout.

AB285


AB285


$39


Oar Set for Frameless Fishing Boats

AL Seat Cushion


AL Seat Cushion


$9


Foam padded cushion for aluminum bench seat for transom boats.

Davit Kit


Davit Kit


$459


Designed and patented by Weaver Industries, the RBD 100 is the world standard for inflatable boats. Davit kit includes all hardware to mount davits on the swim platform of your boat. Glue for Sea Eagle boats included. Call if you are using this kit on other boats.

Floorboard Bag


Floorboard Bag


$49


This bag is made of 440 denier Nylon and features a pouch for stringers and other parts. Keeps your floorboards neat and compact. Fits floorboards for all Sport Runabout Boats and the SE8 and SE9 Motormount Boats.

124smb Start Up Inflatable Boat Package


124smb Start Up Inflatable Boat Package


$499


The largest of Sea Eagle's motormount boats, this roomy and durable inflatable fishing platform is just a fraction of the cost of other fishing boats. The 124smb is even portable enough to pack in a car trunk.

124smb Fisherman's Dream Inflatable Boat Package


124smb Fisherman's Dream Inflatable Boat Package


$699


The largest of Sea Eagle's motormount boats, this roomy and durable inflatable fishing platform is just a fraction of the cost of other fishing boats. The 124smb is even portable enough to pack in a car trunk.

Swivel Seat


Swivel Seat


$68


This comfortable Swivel Seat can be used on many of our Sea Eagle boats. For use on Motormount boats, Sport boats, and the FoldCats the seat can be mounted on a 54 qt. cooler which will fit snugly into any of these boats. (Please note, hardware and bench are not included.) This seat can also be attached to our Seat Spider. This seat CANNOT be attached to a single bench seat (WS25, WS2505 or SPW).

Whitevalve


Whitevalve


$7


Current valve for Sport Kayaks and Motormount Boats. (if your boat is 1998 or earlier, please contact us to verify this is the correct valve)

Vyna Bond Glue


Vyna Bond Glue


$19


For larger repairs on our boats we suggest a 12 oz. can of Vyna Bond PVC Glue.

Recessed One Way


Recessed One Way


$10


Recessed One Way Valve for Transom Boats, Explorer Kayaks, FastTrack kayaks, FoldCats, and Paddleski.

Small Green D-Ring


Small Green D-Ring


$6


Reinforced fabric and corrosion resistant metal make these D-Rings a permanent addition to your boat.

Great for green 385ftg FastTrack, 285fpb and STS10 Frameless Fishing Boats.

Not for use on SE330, SE370, SE6, SE8, SE9 and 124smb boats. Includes glue.


Medium Green D-Ring


Medium Green D-Ring


$9


Reinforced fabric and corrosion resistant metal make these D-Rings a permanent addition to your boat.

Great for green 385ftg FastTrack, 285fpb and STS10 Frameless Fishing Boats.

Not for use on SE330, SE370, SE6, SE8, SE9 and 124smb boats. Includes glue.


Small Repair Kit


Small Repair Kit


$7


Repair kit for Motormount boats and Sport Kayaks. Includes two 4 in. x 3 in. white swatches of material and two tubes of glue.

4 FT. STRAP


4 FT. STRAP


$9


These straps come in handy to keep your gear in place. They are especially good for keeping the POWERCENTER safely strapped to the boats. 48 inches long.

12.6sr Cover


12.6sr Cover


$159


Complete with sewn in shock-cord, these covers fit our boats snugly and keep the rain, snow, and animals off. Completely water and mildew resistant.

14sr Cover


14sr Cover


$169


Complete with sewn in shock-cord, these covers fit our boats snugly and keep the rain, snow, and animals off. Completely water and mildew resistant.

Motormount-FPFB


Motormount-FPFB


$65


Motormount for Frameless Fishing Boats holds up to a 3hp engine or up to 55 lbs thrust electric motor. 18"x11"x11", 6 lbs.

Repair Kit


Repair Kit


$15


Repair kit for 1000 Denier PVC boats. Includes hull repair material, tube of glue & Halkey-Roberts valve replacement tool.

Collapsible Oar Set


Collapsible Oar Set


$59


Designed for our Transom Boats, these oars connect with oarlock pins for fast, comfortable rowing. Collapsible for easy transport. 5 ft. 5 in. long.(pair)


SEMI-CUSTOM BOAT COVER SKI SUPREME SKI SUPREME 1988-1990 SEMI-CUSTOM BOAT COVER SKI SUPREME SKI SUPREME 1988-1990

 

Description

SEMI-CUSTOM FIT BOAT COVER- Made-to-Order, cover is made to accomodate the body style of the boat model and year specified in the item title. These Covers are made to order to fit standard manufacturer models with no optional, aftermarket, add on equipment unless stated in our listing description...

GREAT QUALITY BOAT COVER FITS SLEEKCRAFT 21 DIPLOMAT ALL YEARS Great Quality GREAT QUALITY BOAT COVER FITS SLEEKCRAFT 21 DIPLOMAT ALL YEARS Great Quality

 

Description

Our TOP OF THE LINE Boat Cover will provide all year round outdoor and indoor protection. -Built to last: Our covers will last much longer than any other cover. -Designed for Trailering purposes, as well as storage of your Boat...

GREAT QUALITY BOAT COVER FITS SLEEKCRAFT 21 JR EXECUTIVE ALL YEARS GREAT QUALITY BOAT COVER FITS SLEEKCRAFT 21 JR EXECUTIVE ALL YEARS

 

Description

Our TOP OF THE LINE Boat Cover will provide all year round outdoor and indoor protection. -Built to last: Our covers will last much longer than any other cover. -Designed for Trailering purposes, as well as storage of your Boat...

Internet Law: Cases & Materials (2014) Internet Law: Cases & Materials (2014)

 

Description

This is a casebook for students learning Internet Law, but other people interested in Internet Law may find it interesting. The book covers jurisdiction, contracts, trespass to chattels, intellectual property (copyright, trademarks and domain names), pornography, defamation and other information torts (including limits on web host liability), privacy, spam and the legal issues applicable to blogs and social media...

Legal Aspects of Managing Technology Legal Aspects of Managing Technology

List Price: $257.95

 

Description

For future managers, the fast-paced world of technology offers both unlimited opportunities and difficult challenges. Understanding what the laws are, why they're important, and how they apply to cyberspace will help you to make better decisions...

Trademarks & Unfair Competition: Law and Policy 2012-2013 Case and Statutory Supplement Trademarks & Unfair Competition: Law and Policy 2012-2013 Case and Statutory Supplement

List Price: $38.00

 

Description

Book by Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Mark D. Janis

Sleekcraft jet drive boat running up the river

{ 1 comment }

Haewon Kim, Esq. April 2, 2011 at 1:16 am

RAIN CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. JYP ENTERTAINMENT, LTD. a Korean limited company, JI-HOON JEONG a/k/a RAIN, an individual, STAR M ENTERTAINMENT, a Korean company, Defendants.

03:07-CV-00081-LRH-RAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45282

June 21, 2007, Decided
June 21, 2007, Filed

COUNSEL: [*1] For Rain Corporation, Plaintiff: Michael D Rounds, LEAD ATTORNEY, Watson Rounds, PC, Reno, NV; Padma Choudry, LEAD ATTORNEY, Watson Rounds, Reno, NV US; Matthew D Francis, Watson Rounds, PC, Reno, NV.

For JYP Entertainment, Ltd., Defendant: Christopher C. Larkin, LEAD ATTORNEY, Seyfarth Shaw, Los Angeles, CA; Sunwoo Lee, Victoria Hao, LEAD ATTORNEYS, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washinton DC, DC US; Brad M. Johnston, Hale Lane Peek, Dennison & Howard, Reno, NV.

For Ji-Hoon Jeong, also known as Rain, Defendant: Sunwoo Lee, Victoria Hao, LEAD ATTORNEYS, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washinton DC, DC US; Brad M. Johnston, Hale Lane Peek, Dennison & Howard, Reno, NV.

For Star M Entertainment, Defendant: Brad M. Johnston, Hale Lane Peek, Dennison & Howard, Reno, NV.

JUDGES: LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

OPINION BY: LARRY R. HICKS

OPINION

ORDER
Presently before the court is Rain Corporation's (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (# 12 1 ). Defendants JYP Entertainment, Ltd., Ji-Hoon Jung a/k/a Rain (“Jung”), and Star Entertainment (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a Response (# 19), and Plaintiff replied (# 35).

1 Refers to the court's docket number.

I. Factual Background
This is a trademark and unfair competition [*2] action arising from Jung's use of the word “Rain” to identify himself. Plaintiff is a Nevada corporation in the business of producing and performing musical events featuring its Beatles tribute band called “Rain.” Plaintiff has used the mark “Rain” since 1975 to identify its musical band and services. Plaintiff registered the mark “Rain” for entertainment services with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1988. Plaintiff has performed in approximately thirty states, most Canadian provinces, Jamaica and on international cruise ships.
Defendant Jung is a Korean singer, dancer, model, and actor. In Korea, throughout Asia, and among Asian-American fans in the United States, Jung is primarily known as “Rain.” Jung adopted the Korean name “Bi” (in Korean script), a Korean word that means “rain,” as his stage name. Since 2004, Jung has starred in several television shows broadcast throughout the world via satellite, cable, and availability on DVD. Jung began performing in the United States in February of 2004. In February, 2006, Jung held his first solo concert in the United States at Madison Square Garden. Jung has recently commenced a tour of the United States as part of his [*3] 2006-2007 world tour that began in Korea in October, 2006.
As a result of Jung's use of the term “Rain,” Plaintiff filed this action. At this time, Plaintiff is seeking a preliminary injunction preventing Defendants from using the “Rain” mark, or any confusingly similar variation thereof, in conjunction with the sale, offer for sale, promotion, advertising, or provision of any goods or services in the United States.

II. Legal Standard
The Ninth Circuit uses two alternative tests to determine whether a preliminary injunction should issue. According to the “traditional test,” the equitable criteria for granting preliminary injunctive relief are: (1) a strong likelihood of success on the merits; (2) the possibility of irreparable injury to the plaintiffs if injunctive relief is not granted; (3) a balance of hardships favoring the plaintiffs; and (4) advancement of the public interest. Textile Unlimited, Inc. v. A..BMH & Co., Inc., 240 F.3d 781, 786 (9th Cir.2001) (citing Los Angeles Mem'l Coliseum Comm'n v. Nat'l Football League, 634 F.2d 1197, 1200 (9th Cir.1980)). In the alternative, the Ninth Circuit uses a “sliding scale” or balancing test where injunctive relief is available to a party [*4] who demonstrates either: (1) a combination of probable success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable harm; or (2) that serious questions are raised and the balance of hardships tips in its favor. A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004, 1013 (9th Cir.2001) (citing Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc. v. PPR Realty, Inc., 204 F.3d 867, 874 (9th Cir.2000)).

III. Discussion
In its complaint, Plaintiff asserts causes of action for trademark infringement pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1114(a), unfair competition pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and common law unfair competition and trademark infringement. The test for trademark infringement and unfair competition claims is whether the alleged infringer's use of a mark is likely to cause confusion. M2 Software, Inc. v. Madacy Entm't, 421 F.3d 1073, 1080 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing Cleary v. News Corp., 30 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1994)). “The test for likelihood of confusion is whether a 'reasonably prudent consumer' in the market place is likely to be confused as to the origin of the good or service bearing one of the marks.” Dreamwerks Prod. Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio, 142 F.3d 1127, 1129 (9th Cir. 1998) (footnote omitted). [*5] In determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion, the Ninth Circuit has looked to the following eight non-exclusive factors: strength of the mark, proximity of the goods, similarity of the marks, evidence of actual confusion, marketing channels used, types of goods and the degree of care likely to be exercised by the purchaser, defendant's intent in selecting the mark, and likelihood of expansion of the product lines. AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341, 348-49 (9th Cir. 1979) (citing Sleeper Lounge Co. v. Bell Mfg. Co., 253 F.2d 720, 722 (9th Cir. 1958)). However, this list of factors is not a “score-card” and the relative importance of each factor is case specific. Thane Int'l, Inc. v. Trek Bicycle Corp., 305 F.3d 894, 901 (9th Cir. 2002). The likelihood of confusion inquiry is inherently factual and usually requires a full record. Id. at 902; Clicks Billiards, Inc. v. Sixshooters, Inc., 251 F.3d 1252, 1265 (9th Cir. 2001).
In the case at bar, the court has carefully considered the parties points and authorities along with the evidence presented and concludes that a preliminary injunction is not warranted. The court's preliminary analysis of the Sleekcraft factors [*6] indicates that some factors favor Plaintiff while others favor Defendants. Although Plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence to the court to demonstrate that this case raises serious questions, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate a strong likelihood of success on the merits or that the balance of hardships tips in Plaintiff's favor. The court reiterates, however, that the likelihood of confusion inquiry is a factual inquiry that generally requires a full record. Thane Int'l, Inc., 305 F.3d at 902. Based on the record currently before the court, it appears that the question of whether Jung's use of the term “rain” is likely to cause confusion is ultimately a question of fact that can only be determined by a jury.
With regard to the injury asserted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff argues that Defendants use of the word “rain” in the United States will destroy its hard work and investment because it will be forced to explain to the public and music venues that Plaintiff is not the Korean “Rain.” Other than speculation, Plaintiff has provided no evidence that its hard work and investment will be destroyed. Moreover, the prevailing party in a trademark infringement action is entitled, [*7] subject to the principles of equity, to recover (1) defendant's profits, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) the costs of the action. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). Hence, the harm Plaintiff seeks to avoid is compensable to the extent Plaintiff is successful in this litigation.
Similarly, the court finds that in assessing the need for a preliminary injunction, the balance of hardships favors Jung. If Plaintiff ultimately prevails in this action, the harm it will suffer should no injunction issue is its loss of control over the use of the mark “Rain.” See Int'l Kennel Club of Chicago, Inc. v. Mighty Star, Inc., 846 F.2d 1079, 1091 (7th Cir. 1988) (citing James Burrough, Ltd. v. Sign of Beefeater, Inc., 540 F.2d 266, 276 (7th Cir. 1976)). Beyond this, Plaintiff has yet to provide evidence indicating that it will suffer any actual harm. Jung, on the other hand, is currently beginning the United States portion of his 2006-2007 World Tour. Should an injunction issue, Jung will likely incur substantial costs in communicating the name change effectively. See (Decl. of Sangbong Byun P 13.) Defendants have invested more than three million dollars in the United States portion of Jung's [*8] world tour. Id. As part of this promotion, Defendants have prepared concert-related merchandise, such as t-shirts, hats and phone straps that would have to be withdrawn from the marketplace should an injunction issue. Id. Finally, it is certainly possible that an injunction would confuse Jung's fans as to whether he is actually performing and cause those fans to return tickets or decline to attend Jung's concerts.
In short, the limited evidence before the court fails to show that Plaintiff has a strong likelihood of success on the merits. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence of irreparable harm should an injunction not issue. Nonetheless, Plaintiff has raised serious questions with respect to trademark infringement that will likely need to be decided by a jury. Despite the questions that have been raised, an injunction is not appropriate because the evidence before the court at this stage indicates that the balance of hardships favors Defendants.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (# 12) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 21 day of June, 2007.
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: